[AstroPy] astropy in Debian, Scientific Linux?
Mon Apr 15 17:11:04 CDT 2013
Incidentally, somewhere in my hard drive I have a version of SOFA with
autotools + libtool + pkgconfig support that I would really like to
contribute if SOFA changes its license. Currently the build system is just
a Makefile, without shared library support.
I was Ole who mentioned the anomaly "that anyone can write software that
appears to be the original
SOFA as long as it *isn't* "
2013/4/15 James Turner <email@example.com>
> > In my opinion the best idea is to create a petition. It seems my mail
> > very effective
> +1. Individuals whining obviously aren't going to get anywhere.
> It needs to be made clear to the IAU that it isn't serving the
> best interests of its community and that the future of progress
> in data processing is in open source.
> The other thing would be to persuade a different part of IAU to
> take up the cause, eg. SOFA comes under division A (fundamental
> astronomy) whereas data science is division B. This discussion
> should be driven by top-level considerations as to what
> astronomers need, not theoretical logistical concerns. It won't
> matter what people think of SOFA if no-one uses it -- and as
> someone (Sergio?) mentioned, it's worth pointing out the anomaly
> that anyone can write software that appears to be the original
> SOFA as long as it *isn't* (and therefore bound by their
> licence), rendering the naming restrictions fairly pointless.
> Anyone here a member? I spot only a handful of people I know
> under their division listings.
> > 2013/4/8 Tom Aldcroft <firstname.lastname@example.org
> > <mailto:email@example.com>>
> > Sergio,
> > I wonder if it might be worth trying again with SOFA. Things are a
> > little different now since at this point there are real users that
> > unable to use our (and their) software because of their license.
> > is very frustrating.
> > I wonder if we could organize a petition in support of modifying the
> > SOFA license to something more consistent with typical community
> > standards. I mean the IAU is supposed to be representing and
> > benefiting astronomers, no?
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > AstroPy mailing list
> > AstroPy@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
> AstroPy mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AstroPy