[AstroPy] astropy in Debian, Scientific Linux?
Mon Apr 15 17:16:07 CDT 2013
See also: https://github.com/Starlink/sofa
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Sergio Pascual <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
> Incidentally, somewhere in my hard drive I have a version of SOFA with
> autotools + libtool + pkgconfig support that I would really like to
> contribute if SOFA changes its license. Currently the build system is just
> a Makefile, without shared library support.
> I was Ole who mentioned the anomaly "that anyone can write software that
> appears to be the original
> SOFA as long as it *isn't* "
> 2013/4/15 James Turner <email@example.com>
>> > In my opinion the best idea is to create a petition. It seems my mail
>> > very effective
>> +1. Individuals whining obviously aren't going to get anywhere.
>> It needs to be made clear to the IAU that it isn't serving the
>> best interests of its community and that the future of progress
>> in data processing is in open source.
>> The other thing would be to persuade a different part of IAU to
>> take up the cause, eg. SOFA comes under division A (fundamental
>> astronomy) whereas data science is division B. This discussion
>> should be driven by top-level considerations as to what
>> astronomers need, not theoretical logistical concerns. It won't
>> matter what people think of SOFA if no-one uses it -- and as
>> someone (Sergio?) mentioned, it's worth pointing out the anomaly
>> that anyone can write software that appears to be the original
>> SOFA as long as it *isn't* (and therefore bound by their
>> licence), rendering the naming restrictions fairly pointless.
>> Anyone here a member? I spot only a handful of people I know
>> under their division listings.
>> > 2013/4/8 Tom Aldcroft <firstname.lastname@example.org
>> > <mailto:email@example.com>>
>> > Sergio,
>> > I wonder if it might be worth trying again with SOFA. Things are a
>> > little different now since at this point there are real users that
>> > unable to use our (and their) software because of their license.
>> > is very frustrating.
>> > I wonder if we could organize a petition in support of modifying the
>> > SOFA license to something more consistent with typical community
>> > standards. I mean the IAU is supposed to be representing and
>> > benefiting astronomers, no?
>> > Thanks,
>> > Tom
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AstroPy mailing list
>> > AstroPy@scipy.org
>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/astropy
>> AstroPy mailing list
> AstroPy mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the AstroPy