[IPython-dev] ipython/pydb integration - readline
jorgen.stenarson at bostream.nu
Sun Oct 29 10:47:51 CST 2006
I would also like to see the ability to have separate history buffers
for different modes of ipython. I find it a bit annoying to have to wade
through pdb history when I'm back in standard ipython.
Another thing I'd love to see is the ability to have a context sensitive
tab completion. For instance when completing a magic like %run it would
only complete on filenames and the command switches of %run.
If this would require new functionality in the readline module we have
the possibilty to experiment in pyreadline. Unfortunately at the moment
pyreadline does not work under unix but for the next version I have done
work to make it easier to create interfaces to different consoles. If
anyone would like to pitch in and create something for unix I'm happy to
include it and will help answer questions about how things work in the
In fact the pyreadline refactor branch is coming along nicely (I use it
my self daily now). It also has some nice new features: more of the
editing commands of readline have been implemented, copy paste have been
improved so you can do selection of text using shift and arrow keys, a
vi mode. Anyone that would like to take it for a spin can check it out
R. Bernstein skrev:
> The short one sentence summary is that right now there is a single
> (global) readline history gets used inside %run (if not other places)
> and really the history from an application's %run should separate from
> ipython's history.
> Both ipython and pydb and use readline. When pydb exits it can either
> write its command history, or not save it in which case it is
> truncated. The default is to truncate the history, and I believe the
> effect seen in ipython then, is that after pydb leaves the *ipython*
> history has artifacts of whatever the pydb setting was. That is if
> pydb set to truncate the history, then ipython's history is truncated;
> if not, then the history contains *pydb* entries in addition to the
> ipython entries.
> Sort of. I say this because the ipython "history" command seems to
> work right. So does pydb's equivalent: "show commands".
> There sort of is an implication that adding pydb "broke" things, but
> in thinking and looking at this deeper, it strikes me that the
> readline handling in ipython is currently a little bit broken. Just
> broken in a different way. And I'd be curious to learn if others have
> noticed this as think I have.
> First, *any* program that decides to use readline that is %run from
> ipython (whether -d or not) will have the above issue. So as was
> initially observed, we have interference in the program-to-ipython
> side. But you also have it in the ipython-to-program side. That is,
> inside pdb whenever pdb prompts, *ipython* command completions are
> offered. This isn't all that helpful. And as mentioned above
> "previous-command" (in Emacs: Ctrl-P) spans across the two, which also
> doesn't seem right.
> I think the right solution then would be for ipython to save its
> history (if history saving is on), truncate the history if it can, run
> the command, and the reinstate the history by rereading it from the
> saved history file. Again, this works for all programs, not just pydb.
> - - - -
> One last strongly related topic which includes Fenando's comment about
> the necessity of Python 2.4 support. It was the following readline
> workaround in Debugger.py around line 68 that caused me to initially
> decided to punt on Python < 2.5:
> if sys.version[:3] >= '2.5':
> def __init__(self,color_scheme='NoColor',completekey=None,
> stdin=None, stdout=None):
> ... # I'll come back to this below
> # Ugly hack: for Python 2.3-2.4, we can't call the parent constructor,
> # because it binds readline and breaks tab-completion. This means we
> # have to COPY the constructor here.
> def __init__(self,color_scheme='NoColor'):
> ... #1
> I think the intent at #1 above is basically to copy the code in pdb's
> __init__ constructor omitting "import readline" and the code associated
> with implications of that.
> So it looks to me like the test on version 2.5 has more to do with
> testing the version of *pdb* used than anything else version 2.4 or
> version 2.5. Is this correct?
> Assuming this is the case, when I look the 2.4 pdb versus the 2.5 pdb,
> I see THAT THEY BOTH IMPORT READLINE. In other words the 2.5 branch
> ("I'll come back to this below") should have pdb code copied minus the
> import readline. This has to be a separate branch still because it is
> different code. But none of it appears, so I'd be curious to learn why
> it's not needed in the 2.5 branch.
> Perhaps. And perhaps not. Because if the real solution is to:
> - save the command history file,
> - truncate it,
> - call "run" (or post-mortem)
> - restore the history file by rereading it
> then perhaps the above is moot.
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev at scipy.org
More information about the IPython-dev