[IPython-dev] Fwd: [TIP] py.test 1.0 release / remarks
Tue Aug 4 14:57:26 CDT 2009
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Fernando Perez<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> not that I'm advocating any changes *now*, but this might be worth
> looking into. I think nose and py.test share some ancestry, and it
> seems that py.test is maturing nicely. I especially like the
> 'funcargs' way of writing parametric tests without 'yield': I use
> parametric tests *a lot*, but they are extremely hard to debug when
> they break, because of how nose runs them.
> Just a note for the scratchpad :)
Py.test is way better imho, if nothing, just the nice error reporting.
I will have a look if I can contribute the green [OK] results, I just
can't live without it. Otherwise I think it's pretty good.
More information about the IPython-dev