[IPython-dev] future division in embedded ipython

Carl Smith carl.input@gmail....
Wed Jul 4 13:04:39 CDT 2012


Fair enough. I don't really understand the finer points. I was responding
at first just to offer user feedback on the issue.
On Jul 4, 2012 6:38 PM, "Thomas Kluyver" <takowl@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4 July 2012 18:26, Carl Smith <carl.input@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe a configurable or something, so the user can set the way it works,
> and
> > just document it?? I'm not really sure.
>
> We try not to add more configuration unless it looks like there's a
> real need to have both options:
> - If it's configurable, there's an extra maintenance burden of making
> sure each option continues working in different scenarios.
> - Most users will never go looking for an obscure config option, so it
> doesn't relieve us from the burden of picking out a sensible default.
>
> In this case, I'm leaning towards the view that embedded IPython
> *should* inherit the future flags, without any config option. But it
> warrants some discussion.
>
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> IPython-dev mailing list
> IPython-dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/ipython-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/attachments/20120704/f5353b79/attachment.html 


More information about the IPython-dev mailing list