[IPython-User] Getting a clean prompt without Ctrl-C
Sun Jan 15 07:35:29 CST 2012
On Jan 15, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Thomas Wiecki <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Fernando Perez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Thomas Wiecki
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I don't really see why this should be inconsistent to the ipython text
>>> console (which allows multiline with strg+enter).
>> Which IPython are you referring to? There is no way to enter
>> multiline text in the terminal, period.
> Right, I tried it in the qtconsole and assumed it worked the same in
> the terminal, thanks for the clarification.
>> The notebook is designed first and foremost for multiline editing, so
>> we made the decision early on to stick with separate keystrokes for
>> newline and code execution, leaving enter to naturally do newline. In
>> this regard, we've made the same choice Mathematica made over 15 years
>> ago and Sage in 2006, and I happen to think it is the right UI choice
>> as well (we happily deviate from other systems whenever we think
>> there's a better solution).
>> If anyone has a suggestion on how to improve the user experience,
>> we're certainly happy to hear ideas. But be sure that these choices
>> were not an accident, and rather the result of *extremely* careful
>> consideration and years of experience with both the Mathematica and
>> Sage notebooks.
> I am very certain they are. I haven't used the notebook as much but my
> usage pattern is similar to that of the qtconsole/terminal. So I think
> it is likely that the notebook will be used for very different
> purposes. Some people (e.g. those who used Sage or Mathematica before,
> or those who want to do mainly multiline editing) will appreciate the
> consistency, others (like me) coming from the terminal or qtconsole
> will expect/want it to work just like those do and think the other way
> to be inconsistent.
> What about making execute-on-enter an option in the notebook config?
> Or a check-box in the notebook itself.
I second that request :)
> In any case, this is a minor confusion and a detail in an overall
> amazing and much appreciated feature.
> My 2 cents,
More information about the IPython-User