[IPython-User] evolution of sharing IPYNB?
Sun Mar 17 12:57:52 CDT 2013
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Kluyver <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 17 March 2013 17:40, Matthias BUSSONNIER <email@example.com>wrote:
>> So IMHO, including it "as is" is not good. We could also do it 100% in js
>> with github.js.
> OK, so it sounds like we're broadly agreed that we want to include it
> after it's been refactored to use the gist API directly, and it can handle
> cases where you don't own the gist. This is probably a decent standalone
> project that someone could do in a few days.
> I'm not worried about giving gist privileged status - at present, I don't
> know of any other service that does quite the same thing. There's nothing
> to stop people building extensions to integrate with other sites, and if
> they get enough popularity, we'd consider including them in IPython.
Also to argue against myself:
I think we should be putting more and more of these things in extensions,
and less and less in IPython itself.
I will probably rewrite it as a 'jsplugin' once we actually come up with
but I would honestly vote against including a gist share button integrated
into IPython by default.
> IPython-User mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IPython-User