[Numpy-discussion] Community Poll: numarray default underflow handling == "ignore" ?
Alexander Schmolck
a.schmolck at gmx.net
Fri Nov 21 19:24:05 CST 2003
"Sebastian Haase" <haase at msg.ucsf.edu> writes:
> Hi Alexander,
> Thanks for your reply and yes, I would be very interested to see more of
> your "pretty print" code.
Sure, I'll send you the code. As it is for a matrix class it only handles up
to (array-)rank 2 currently (and uses methods of the matrix class) but I don't
think changing either of these should be too hard.
> I am trying to put together all kinds of useful things to make python ( with
> numarray and scipy) a possible replacement for Matlab...
<grin> Been, there done that -- actually still doing it.
When I was faced with the choice between matlab and python for my numerical
work, I decided that despite the convince matlab offered for many things
(libraries, interactive environment) I couldn't face the its monstrosity as a
programming language and thus opted for python.
These were the main areas were I found python/Numeric was lagging behind:
1. Numeric.dot was much too slow (factor 40-100 and more for large arrays)
2. Although Numeric's arrays are quite general and powerful, I found writing
down simple matrix expressions (dot(transpose(X), dot(...))) and the visual
clarity of the repr of the result less attractive than matlab's.
3. Library support (e.g. in some fields many academics tend to make matlab
code corresponding to their articles available, which is very handy to
quickly try something).
4. Matlab came with very good plotting capabilities, whereas python's support
for plotting was quite poor when I started using it.
5. Matlab also had a pretty good interactive environment.
So far I've managed to come up with the following (sometimes partial)
solutions for the above problems.
1. An optional fast dot product using blas (although I somehow still ended up
spending a few days on it, all the real work was done by my supervisor
Richard Everson -- I've submitted a patch that made it into Numeric 23 but
I don't think numarray has an the option of a fast dot product yet,
although I haven't checked).
2. A powerful matrix class (mostly finished; should transparently support
Numeric as well as numarray (the latter is not fully there yet),
unreleased).
3. A high-level matlab interface (pretty much ready to be released).
4. A convenient and high-level plotting library that supports multiple
backends (currently only proper support for matlab as backend although I
started working on/contemplating others (e.g. grace, gnuplot and chaco);
unreleased)
5. IPython (kudos to Fernando!) + emacs + a few convenience functions for
things like saving variables and redefining classes makes a darn nice
environment once one got the hang of it (unfortunately it meant I had to
write the emacs support for ipython, it's available on the ipython
website).
Of course if anyone wants to lend a hand, he/she is more than welcome ;)
> I am not hoping for a similarly big documentation and help system, but just
Why not? Nowadays pretty much all python code comes with pretty good
docstrings and implementing something like 'lookfor' shouldn't be particularly
hard. Already looking up docs and jumping to code in ipython is quite
convenient (e.g. ``some_func?``).
> the fact that it's free ( doesn't need to connect to a "license server"
> every other minute) and that it happily supports single-precision arrays
> ( not to mention memmap array !) should make it interesting.
And that it is not based on an abomination of a programming language but an
excellent one, with plenty of high quality general purpose libs (and even if
only doing numerics is concerned: Numeric/numarray's (APL-ish) design also
doesn't compare badly to matlab, IMHO).
> I know that I probably should use IPython,
Indeed, everyone should (from within emacs ;)
'as
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list