[Numpy-discussion] numarray and NaN ?
Chris Barker
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Tue Sep 23 15:04:06 CDT 2003
Perry Greenfield wrote:
> I don't recall if there was disagreement about this being useful,
probably not
> but perhaps there was disagreement that it should always do this.
absolutely, and I think there was a wide range of opinions about how
usefull (and or critical!) this is.
> numarray allows one to customize how errors are handled. You can
> choose:
>
> 1) to silently ignore all errors.
> 2) print a warning message (default)
> 3) raise an exception.
>
> One may separately set one of these three behaviors for each of
> the 4 ieee categories of floating point errors, namely
>
> 1) invalid results (i.e., NaNs)
> 2) divide by zeros (Infs)
> 3) overflows
> 4) underflows
Fabulous!!! You folks are wonderfull! I guess it's time to make the
switch to numarray...I've been waiting for a compelling reason!
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list