[off topic] Re: [Numpy-discussion] numarray speed - PySequence_GetItem
jmiller at stsci.edu
Tue Jun 29 15:03:02 CDT 2004
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 16:19, Tim Hochberg wrote:
> I'd bet a case of beer (or cash equivalent) that one of the main
> bottlenecks is the path
I won't take the bet but if this works out, you get the beer. If it
doesn't, well, I don't drink anymore anyway.
> The path through _universalIndexing in particular, if I deciphered it
> correctly, looks very slow. I don't think it needs to be that way
> though, _universalIndexing could probably be sped up, but more promising
> I think _ndarray_item could be made to call _simpleIndexingCore without
> all that much work. It appears that this would save the creation of
> several intermediate objects and it also looks like a couple of calls
> back to python! I'm not familiar with this code though, so I could
> easily be missing something that makes calling _simpleIndexingCore
> harder than it looks.
This looks very promising. I'll take a look tomorrow.
More information about the Numpy-discussion