[Numpy-discussion] Numeric to numarray experiences
Perry Greenfield
perry at stsci.edu
Tue Oct 5 17:30:58 CDT 2004
Steve Walton wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:00, Flavio Coelho wrote:
> > I wrote
> > > env USE_LAPACK=1 python setup.py build
> > >
> > > after editing addons.py appropriately. You should see a major speed
> > > improvement.
> > >
> >
> >
> > If that is the case, why is it not the default?, at least when LAPACK
> > is installed?
>
> Well, I won't pretend to speak for the developers on this one. But I
> strongly suspect it is just too hard to find all possible LAPACK
> distributions; the default numarray setup should be self contained even
> if somewhat slower. The current version of Numeric also defaults to its
> own built-in BLAS and requires editing setup.py to use a different one.
>
Well, it's been a while, and Todd handled that aspect of porting those
from Numeric, but if I recall correctly, the situation was the same
there, and I think Steve is correct. It was to provide the basic
functionality as part of the distribution without requiring other
installations. If you needed better performance, you jump through a
couple more hoops. But requiring it to use LAPACK makes life more difficult
for those who were looking for a self contained and easy to install
solution.
Perry
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list