[Numpy-discussion] still no cross product for new array type
Robert Kern
rkern at ucsd.edu
Mon Aug 15 15:32:36 CDT 2005
Perry Greenfield wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Chris Barker apparently wrote:
>>
>>> If we could ever get Python to include additional
>>> operators, we could have a Numeric array package and
>>> linear algebra package all in one. both with nice
>>> notation, that would be nice.
>>
>> Yep.
>
> I wonder if we shouldn't use the operator hack recently added to the
> cookbook to give some sort of capability for this. It doesn't support
> precedence that people would like, but it maybe useful enough. What do
> people think?
>
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/384122
If it's placed in a separate module with other such pseudo-operators
(|dot|, |land|, |lor|) rather than in Numeric.py itself, I'm +1 on this.
It's such a beautiful hack.
--
Robert Kern
rkern at ucsd.edu
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list