[Numpy-discussion] Matlab/Numeric/numarray benchmarks
Bruce Southey
southey at uiuc.edu
Thu Jan 6 06:31:34 CST 2005
Hi,
While on the subject on benchmarks, I thought I would point out an really
excellent book by Hans Petter Langtangen's book:
'Python Scripting for computational science' (Springer, 2004:
http://www.springeronline.com/sgw/cda/frontpage/0,0,4-0-22-17627636-0,0.html ).
The book web site is http://folk.uio.no/hpl/scripting/
that also has the scripts.
There is considerable detailed material on using Numeric and numarray as well
as using Python callbacks from C/C++ and Fortran. Also addresses GUI
programming and other topics in Python including regular expressions.
One of the really great things about this book is the discussion on how to
improve code with reference to a single example called gridloop. Gridloop just
evaluates a function (the actual function used was 'sin(x,y) + 8*x') over a
rectangular grid and stores the results in an array. There are well over 25
versions from using straight C, Fortran and C++ to using Python and Numerical
Python.
These benchmarks are on different ways to implement this gridloop function
in Fortran, C/C++, numarray, Numeric and Python callbacks from C/C++ and
Fortran. In the vectorized form relative to the F77 version, numarray (v0.9)
was 2.7 times slower and Numeric (v23) was 3.0 times slower.
Another items that appeared was that since the sin function is scalar, there
was a huge difference in the Python implementation between using math.sin (140
times slower than F77), Numeric.sin (230 times slower than F77)and
numarray.sin (350 times slower than F77). Perhaps, this suggests that namespace
should be checked for scalar arguments before using vectorized versions.
Regards
Bruce Southey
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list