[Numpy-discussion] Matlab is a tool for doing numerical computations with matrices and vectors.
oliphant at ee.byu.edu
Thu Mar 10 15:16:27 CST 2005
>> I remember his work. I really liked many of his suggestions, though
>> it took him a while to recognize that a Matrix class has been
>> distributed with Numeric from very early on.
> numpy.pdf dated 03-07-18 has
> "For those users, the Matrix class provides a more intuitive
> interface. We defer discussion of the Matrix class until later."
> On the same page there is:
> The Matrix.py python module defines a class Matrix which is a
> subclass of UserArray. The only differences
> between Matrix instances and UserArray instances is that the *
> operator on Matrix performs a
> matrix multiplication, as opposed to element-wise multiplication,
> and that the power operator ** is disallowed
> for Matrix instances."
> In view of the above, I can understand why Huaiyu Zhu took a while.
> His proposal was much more ambitious.
There is always a lag between documentation and implementation. I
would be interested to understand what "more ambitious" elements are
still not in Numeric's Matrix object (besides the addition of a language
operator of course).
> Yes, I know that the power operator is implemented and that there is a
> random matrix but I hope that some attention is given to the
> functionality PyMatrix. I recognize that the implementation has some
Which aspects are you most interested in? I would be happy if you
would consider placing something like PyMatrix under scipy_core instead
of developing it separately.
>> Yes, it needed work, and a few of his ideas were picked up on and
>> included in Numeric's Matrix object.
> I suggest that this overstates what was picked up.
I disagree. I was the one who picked them up and I spent a bit of time
doing it. I implemented the power method, the ability to build matrices
in blocks, the string processing for building matrices, and a lot of the
special attribute names for transpose, hermitian transpose, and so forth.
There may be some attributes that weren't picked up, and a discussion of
which attributes are most important is warranted.
> Good, on both scores. I hope that the PEP will set out these ideas.
You are probably in a better position time-wise to outline what you
think belongs in a Matrix class. I look forward to borrowing your ideas
for inclusion in scipy_core.
More information about the Numpy-discussion