[Numpy-discussion] python-numeric in FC4: good idea?
stephen.walton at csun.edu
Mon Sep 26 08:40:01 CDT 2005
Fernando Perez wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> Can you make an RPM of python-numeric compiled against ATLAS and install
>> it yourself?
> You can. In fact, Numeric builds out of the box with
> python bdist_rpm,
> though the package name comes out to be named 'Numeric', but that
> should not be a problem, since the setup.cfg file reads:
> provides=python-numeric, python-numeric-devel
> which means that the python-numeric dependency should be satisfied.
Yes, it is, and I sort of found that out myself. Yum is much smarter
about this than RPM apparently; if I do
rpm -U Numeric-23.8-i386.rpm
rpm refuses to replace python-numeric-23.7 as distributed with FC4, but
"yum install Numeric" when pointed at my local repo works fine. As does
"rpm -i --force" of course.
There is at least a verbal commitment at bugzilla.redhat.com from Redhat
to migrate pygtk2 to the new array object when it comes out.
More information about the Numpy-discussion