[Numpy-discussion] mixing arrays and matrices: squeeze yes, flattened no?
svetosch at gmx.net
Tue Feb 21 15:49:02 CST 2006
Travis Oliphant schrieb:
> Sven Schreiber wrote:
>> Next, I try to workaround by b.squeeze(). That seems to work, but why is
>> b.squeeze().shape == (1, 112) instead of (112,)?
> Again the same reason as before. A matrix is returned from b.squeeze()
> and there are no 1-d matrices. Thus, you get a row-vector. Use .T if
> you want a column vector.
Well if squeeze can't really squeeze matrix-vectors (doing a de-facto
transpose instead), wouldn't it make more sense to disable the squeeze
method for matrices altogether?
>> Then I thought maybe b.flattened() does the job, but then I get an error
>> (matrix has no attr flattened). Again, I'm baffled.
> The correct spelling is b.flatten()
Ok, but I copied .flattened() from p. 48 of your book, must be a typo then.
> You can mix arrays and matrices just fine if you remember that 1d arrays
> are equivalent to row-vectors.
Btw, did the recent numpy release change anything in terms of preserving
matrix types when passing to decompositions etc? I checked the release
notes but maybe they're just not verbose enough.
More information about the Numpy-discussion