[Numpy-discussion] .M .A .T .H attribute result
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Sat Jul 8 14:57:41 CDT 2006
On 7/8/06, Fernando Perez <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> On 7/7/06, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> wrote:
> > I didn't compile the results, but the discussion on the idea of adding
> > new attributes to the array object led to the following result.
> > Added: .T attribute to mean self.transpose()
> > .H
> > A few were in favor, but this can now be written .T.conj() which is not
> > bad so does not get a new attribute.
> I didn't have strong feelings one way or another on this, so I didn't
> vote, but at this point I'd like to make a comment before the freeze.
> Given that .T went in, I'd argue that .H should be in as well.
> Basically, I now think these two should have been considered as a
> bundle and not as separate options.
+1. H is just the complex counterpart of T.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion