[Numpy-discussion] Matrix construction
wbaxter at gmail.com
Thu Jun 22 03:54:04 CDT 2006
On 6/22/06, Ed Schofield <schofield at ftw.at> wrote:
> On 22/06/2006, at 12:40 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> > Actually I think using mat() (just an alias for the matrix
> > constructor) is a bad way to do it. That mat() (and most others on
> > that page) should probably be replaced with asmatrix() to avoid the
> > copy.
> Perhaps the 'mat' function should become an alias for 'asmatrix'.
> I've thought this for a while.
That makes sense to me. As far as I know, asmatrix() defaults to calling
the constructor if it can't snarf the memory of the object being passed in.
So, go on, shoot Ed and me down! :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion