[Numpy-discussion] rand argument question

Sven Schreiber svetosch at gmx.net
Sat Jun 3 04:52:57 CDT 2006


Robert Kern schrieb:

> 
> My point is that there is no need to change rand() and randn() to the "new"
> interface. The "new" interface is already there: random.random() and
> random.standard_normal().
> 

Ok thanks for the responses and sorry for not searching the archives
about this.
I tend to share Alan's point of view, but I also understand that it may
be too late now to change the way rand is called.
-Sven




More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list