[Numpy-discussion] Array Protocol change for Python 2.6
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Fri Jun 16 16:44:33 CDT 2006
Thomas Heller wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> Francesc Altet wrote:
>>> A Divendres 09 Juny 2006 11:54, Albert Strasheim va escriure:
>>>> Just out of curiosity:
>>>> In : x = N.array()
>>>> In : x.__array_data__
>>>> Out: ('0x01C23EE0', False)
>>>> Is there a reason why the __array_data__ tuple stores the address as a hex
>>>> string? I would guess that this representation of the address isn't the
>>>> most useful one for most applications.
>>> Good point. I hit this before and forgot to send a message about this. I agree
>>> that a integer would be better. Although, now that I think about this, I
>>> suppose that the issue should be the difference of representation of longs in
>>> 32-bit and 64-bit platforms, isn't it?
>> Like how Win64 uses 32-bit longs and 64-bit pointers. And then there's
>> signedness. Please don't use Python ints to encode pointers. Holding arbitrary
>> pointers is the job of CObjects.
> (Sorry, I'm late in reading this thread. I didn't know there were so many
> numeric groups)
> Python has functions to convert pointers to int/long and vice versa: PyInt_FromVoidPtr()
> and PyInt_AsVoidPtr(). ctypes uses them, ctypes also represents addresses as ints/longs.
The function calls are PyLong_FromVoidPtr() and PyLong_AsVoidPtr()
though, right? I'm happy representing pointers as Python integers
(Python long integers on curious platforms like Win64).
More information about the Numpy-discussion