[Numpy-discussion] fread codes versus numpy types

Fernando Perez fperez.net at gmail.com
Wed Jun 28 14:00:05 CDT 2006


On 6/28/06, David M. Cooke <cookedm at physics.mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:22:38 -0600
> "Fernando Perez" <fperez.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should I apply this patch, so we push the cleaned-up API even a bit harder?
>
> Yes please. I think all the modules that still use the oldnumeric names
> actually import numpy.oldnumeric themselves.

Done, r2017.  I also committed the simple one-liner:

Index: weave/inline_tools.py
===================================================================
--- weave/inline_tools.py       (revision 2016)
+++ weave/inline_tools.py       (working copy)
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
 def compile_function(code,arg_names,local_dict,global_dict,
                      module_dir,
                      compiler='',
-                     verbose = 0,
+                     verbose = 1,
                      support_code = None,
                      headers = [],
                      customize = None,

from a discussion we had a few weeks ago, I'd forgotten to put it in.
I did it as a separate patch (r 2018) so it can be reverted separately
if anyone objects.

Cheers,

f




More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list