[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
tim.leslie at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 19:42:13 CDT 2006
On 7/1/06, Eric Jonas <jonas at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 12:35 -0400, Sasha wrote:
> > > Besides, decent unit tests will catch these problems. We all know
> > > that every scientific code in existence is unit tested to the smallest
> > > routine, so this shouldn't be a problem for anyone.
> > Is this a joke? Did anyone ever measured the coverage of numpy
> > unittests? I would be surprized if it was more than 10%.
> Given the coverage is so low, how can people help by contributing unit
> tests? Are there obvious areas with poor coverage? Travis, do you have
> any opinions on this?
A handy tool for finding these things out is coverage.py. I've found
it quite helpful in checking unittest coverage in the past.
I don't think I'll have a chance in the immediate future to try it out
with numpy, but if someone does, I'm sure it will give some answers to
your questions Eric.
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
More information about the Numpy-discussion