[Numpy-discussion] Numpy licenses

Paul Dubois pfdubois at gmail.com
Thu Mar 2 09:07:04 CST 2006


Numeric and numpy are not related from a licensing point of view. Numeric
was released under an LLNL-written open source license. Travis wrote numpy
and he can put any license he wants on that.

On 02 Mar 2006 09:03:12 -0800, Jeffery D. Collins <
jcollins_boulder at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> The SF site claims the following for Numeric/Numpy:
>
> License : OSI-Approved Open Source
> <http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=14>, GNU
> General Public License (GPL)
> <http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php?form_cat=15>
>
>
> Can this be changed to reflect LICENSE.TXT?  Numpy (and the older
> Numeric-*) has never been GPL'd, correct?
>
> Also, a previous thread mentioned that the licensing terms for f2py will
> be changed from LGPL.  In the svn trunk, some of its documentation still
> refers to LGPL, particularly f2py2e.py.   Will this be changed before
> the next release?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060302/ac14a35f/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list