[Numpy-discussion] atol in allclose

Robert Kern robert.kern at gmail.com
Tue Nov 28 19:44:49 CST 2006


Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry to keep cluttering the list, but I was a bit surprised by this
> behavior of allclose:
> 
> In [25]:allclose([1.0], [1.0], rtol=0)
> Out[25]:True
> 
> In [26]:allclose([1.0], [1.0], rtol=0, atol=0)
> Out[26]:False
> 
> The docstring seems to imply that atol will not be used in this
> comparison - or did I misunderstand?

The docstring is a somewhat loose interpretation of the actual implementation.
You've exposed a corner case. The long and the short of it is this:

    d = less(absolute(x-y), atol + rtol * absolute(y))

rtol was never intended to be less than the epsilon of your chosen floating
point type much less 0. That's what == is for.

That said, less() should probably be less_equal(), and the docstring can be
clearly describe what is going on.

-- 
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list