Should numpy.sqrt(-1) return 1j rather than nan?
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Thu Oct 12 12:49:25 CDT 2006
As someone on this list (sorry to quick with the delete button) said:
"numpy is closer to the metal than MATLAB"
MATLAB aside, numpy is somewhat "close to the metal". I think this is
clearly part of its design philosophy, and also something I personally
like about out.
Getting back to MATLAB (at least version 4, the last one I used
regularly) -- everything in MATLAB is a matrix of double precision
Floating points. (or complex - that does get weird!). This makes things
simpler for a lot of use, but restricts the power and flexibility
Everything in numpy is an array of arbitrary shape and many possible
data types -- this is more to think about, but give you a lot of power
and flexibility. In any case, that is what numpy is. Period.
Given that, arrays of different types behave differently -- that's
something you'd darn well better understand pretty soon in your numpy
>>> a = N.array((1,2,3), dtype=N.uint8)
>>> a *= 200
array([200, 144, 88], dtype=uint8)
Oh my gosh! 2 * 200 isn't 144! what happened?
This isn't any different than sqrt(-1) resulting in NaN or an error. In
fact, there are all sorts of places where upcasting is not happening
automagically -- in fact, I think that's become more consistent in the
new numpy. So, in numpy you need to choose the datatype appropriate for
your problem at hand. I know I always know whether I want to work in the
complex plane or not.
Another change recently made is to make doubles the default in more
places -- I like that change.
So, given the entire philosophy and current status of how numpy works,
the ONLY question that is legitimate here is:
Should the "default" datatype be complex or double? I vote double.
Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Now, it would be possible to give ufuncs a dtype keyword argument that
> allowed you to specify which underlying loop was to be used for the
> sqrt(a, dtype=complex).
I like this OK, and isn't is similar to the dtype argument in the
accumulating methods? (sum, etc.). However, it's probably not worth the
C-api change -- is it that different than calling:
As for scipy, I heartily agree that scipy should be a superset of numpy,
and NOT change the behavior of numpy functions and methods. We're taking
the opportunity at this point for numpy to break backward compatibility
with Numeric/numarray -- this is probably the best time to do the same
couldn't we at least introduce new names?
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
More information about the Numpy-discussion