[Numpy-discussion] general version of repmat?
Alan G Isaac
aisaac at american.edu
Fri Sep 22 08:53:32 CDT 2006
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Bill Baxter apparently wrote:
> Ok, here's my best shot at a generalized repmat:
Sorry to always repeat this suggestion when
it comes to repmat, but I think the whole approach
is wrong. A repmat should be a separate object type,
which behaves like the described matrix but has only one
copy of the repetitive data.
More information about the Numpy-discussion