[Numpy-discussion] scipy.scons branch: building numpy and scipy with scons
Wed Dec 5 00:07:02 CST 2007
David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007 1:14 PM, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> This, too, is a workaround for the less-than-desirable situation of having
>> numpy's sizable build infrastructure bundled with the numpy package itself. If
>> this stuff were an entirely separate package focused on providing this
>> scons-based build infrastructure, then we wouldn't have a problem. We could just
>> update it on its own release schedule. People would probably be more willing to
>> use the development versions of it, too, instead of having to also buy into the
>> development version of their array package as well.
> The only problem I see is that this increases the chance of losing
> synchronization. I don't know if this is significant.
The problem I see is that numpy-the-array-library and
numpy.distutils-the-build-infrastructure are two related packages with
*over*-synchronized cycles. We aren't going to push out a micro-release of
numpy-the-array-library just because a new version of Intel Fortran comes out
and changes its flags.
> IMHO, the only
> real solution would be to fix distutils (how many people want a shared
> library builder in python community, for example ?), but well, it is
> not gonna happen in a foreseeable future, unfortunately
I don't see how that's relevant to the problem I raised. Supporting Fortran in
the standard library would make the problem even worse. distutils is certainly
not broken because it doesn't support Fortran.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Numpy-discussion