[Numpy-discussion] multinomial question
Robert Kern
robert.kern@gmail....
Wed Dec 5 20:34:41 CST 2007
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> I would think that
> multinomial(1,prob,size=ntrials).sum(axis=0)
> would be equivalent to
> multinomial(ntrials,prob)
> but the first gives a surprising result. (See below.)
> Explanation?
A bug in rk_binomial_inversion(). Unfortunately, this looks like a logical bug
in the sources I was deriving this code from. The "safety bound" on the search
inversion search cuts out too early. Now that I re-examine it, it looks the
bound (whichever of the multiple choice of bounds one could use) could always be
legitimately exceeded, so there shouldn't be a bound at all. I'll have to dive
deeper to figure out what is going on. This makes me grumpy.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list