[Numpy-discussion] Should bool_ subclass int?
Timothy Hochberg
tim.hochberg@ieee....
Tue Jul 10 11:25:53 CDT 2007
[CHOP: lots of examples]
It looks like bool_s could use some general rejiggering. Let me put forth a
concrete proposal that's based on matching bool_ behaviour to that of
Python's bools. There is another route that could be taken where bool_ and
bool are completely decoupled, but I'll skip over that for now since I don't
really think it's a good idea.
1. +,- are arithmetic operators and return ints not booleans
2. *,** are arithmetic operators on scalars and arrays and return ints
as above.
3. &,|,^ are the logical operators and return booleans.
4. *,** are defined on matrices to perform logical matrix
multiplication and exponation.
This seems like the simplest route towards something that is both internally
self consistent and consistent with Python.
--
. __
. |-\
.
. tim.hochberg@ieee.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20070710/996e3f3b/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list