[Numpy-discussion] in place random generation
Thu Mar 8 09:24:16 CST 2007
On 3/8/07, Matthew Brett <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > My problem is not space, but time.
> > > I am creating a small array over and over,
> > > and this is turning out to be a bottleneck.
> How about making one large random number array and taking small views?
How is that different from:
Allocating all the arrays as one n+1 dim and grabbing rows from it
is faster than allocating the small arrays individually.
I am iterating too many times to allocate everything at once though.
I can just do a nested loop
where create manageably large arrays in the outer
and grab the rows in the inner,
but I wanted something cleaner.
later in the post
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
More information about the Numpy-discussion