[Numpy-discussion] Detect subclass of ndarray
Sat Mar 24 15:02:59 CDT 2007
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Charles R Harris apparently wrote:
>> Yes, that is what I am thinking. Given that there are only the two
>> possibilities, row or column, choose the only one that is compatible with
>> the multiplying matrix. The result will not always be a column vector, for
>> instance, mat([])*ones(3) will be a 1x3 row vector.
> Ack! The simple rule `post multiply means its a column vector`
> would be horrible enough: A*ones(n)*B becomes utterly obscure.
> Now even that simple rule is to be violated??
> Down this path lies madness.
> Please, just raise an exception.
My opinion is that a 1-d array in matrix-multiplication should always be
interpreted as a row vector. Is this not what is currently done? If
not, then it is a bug in my mind.
More information about the Numpy-discussion