[Numpy-discussion] Anyone have a well-tested SWIG-based C++ STL valarray <=> numpy.array typemap to share?

Alexander Schmolck a.schmolck@gmx....
Fri Sep 21 05:57:01 CDT 2007


David Cournapeau <david@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> writes:

> Alexander Schmolck wrote:
>> "Charles R Harris" <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>   
>>> The automatic handling of pointers for the default allocation type is also
>>> convenient and makes it reasonable to have functions return matrices and
>>> vectors.
>>>     
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder whether I missed something when I read the manual. I didn't see
>> anything in the docs that suggests that ublas matrices do COW, reference
>> semantics or anything else to make C++'s horrible pass-by-value semantics
>> bearable performancewise, so I return and pass in shared_ptr's to matrices,
>> which is syntactically ugly but avoids the need to write a (reference
>> semantics) wrapper class for matrix. Am I missing some easier way to
>> efficiently return and pass large matrices?
>>   
> If ublas is using expression template, shouldn't it alleviate somewhat 
> this problem ?

I don't think so, but then I'm hardly a C++ whizz. As far as I can tell the
point of expression tempaltes is just to provide syntactic sugar so that one
can write fairly complex in-place computations as a normal mathematical
expression.

But say I want to pass a big matrix of datapoints to a classifier -- how would
expression templates help here? Ublas does have various view objects, but
they're of limited usefulness, because they don't provide the same
functionality as the matrix class itself.


'as


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list