[Numpy-discussion] Release of NumPy
Stéfan van der Walt
Wed Apr 16 15:22:11 CDT 2008
On 16/04/2008, Alan Isaac <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> It seems lots of complexity for a payoff I do not see.
> My proposal is simpler and stays closer to ndarray behavior.
I showed you exactly where your proposal breaks down -- numerous times:
x is no longer the same as x[0,:]
> But having a matrix be a container of such "RowVectors" is
> better than the current behavior. I do not see that it
> gets in the way of anything desirable, as long as the
> array attribute of your "vectors" will return a 1d array.
Did you try the patch? Do you think that a (column) vector should
convert to a 1d array?
More information about the Numpy-discussion