[Numpy-discussion] Release of NumPy

Bill Spotz wfspotz@sandia....
Thu Apr 17 10:45:06 CDT 2008


Since I am the one who initially proposed the RowVector/ColumnVector  
idea, I have followed the discussion here with interest.  However,  
since I typically deal with sparse matrices, I didn't feel like I had  
much to contribute to the indexing issues.  But now that we are  
getting into sparse matrices, that has changed a little....

On Apr 17, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Alan G Isaac wrote:
>>
>> What is more, Travis's question seems
>> to kill my proposal, since it seems to
>> imply that
>>
> I didn't intentionally mean to do that.
>
>>        - the behavior of matrices and sparse matrices
>>          should match
>>
> This is what I would like.
>>        - that x[0] should yield a sparse matrix if x is
>>          a sparse matrix
>>
> This is what is debatable.


So, I would expect to be able to access S[i,j], where S is a sparse  
matrix, and get 0 if (i,j) is not stored, and the correct value if  
(i,j) is stored.  This would be consistent behavior with dense  
matrices.  But what should S[i] return, (or S[:,j])?

Along the lines of RowVector/ColumnVector, we could define  
SparseRowVector/SparseColumnVector classes, which would provide the  
expected behavior.  Internally, they would store non-zero elements,  
and their corresponding indexes.  Externally, v[i] (where v is one of  
the SparseVector classes) would just return the appropriate (zero or  
non-zero) value.  Then

     S[i]   -> SparseRowVector
     S[:,j] -> SparseColumnVector

This would be consistent behavior between dense and sparse matrices  
and support proper M[i][j] access.  I don't know what iterating over a  
SparseVector would mean/imply.

And it provides an example of the additional capabilities Alan has  
been asking about.

(I am assuming here a compressed-row or compressed-column storage  
format, but I think it could apply to other sparse matrix formats as  
well.)

** Bill Spotz                                              **
** Sandia National Laboratories  Voice: (505)845-0170      **
** P.O. Box 5800                 Fax:   (505)284-0154      **
** Albuquerque, NM 87185-0370    Email: wfspotz@sandia.gov **








More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list