[Numpy-discussion] Toward a numpy build with warning: handling unused variable
Charles R Harris
Tue Aug 5 07:49:46 CDT 2008
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:28 AM, David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <email@example.com> wrote:
> > David, I second your approach. Furthermore, look how SWIG handles
> > this, it is very similar to your proposal. The difference is that SWIG
> > uses SWIGUNUSED for some autogenerated functions. Furthermore, it
> > seems the SWIG developers protected the generated code taking into
> > account GCC versions ;-) and the C++ case, and also Intel compilers.
> Yes, I would have been surprised if most compilers do not have a way
> to deal with that. I did not know icc handled __attribute__.
> Charles, are you still have strongly against this, since this is in
> the vein of what you suggested (tagging the argument) ?
I think tagging the argument is the way to go.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion