[Numpy-discussion] Generalized ufuncs?

[Charles R Harris]

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <oliphant@enthought.com
> wrote:

>
> >
> > Can we fix the ticket notification mailings some day? It's been almost
> > four months now.
> That would be fabulous.  So far nobody has figured out how... Jarrod??
> >
> > Re: the patch. I noticed the replacement of the signed type int by an
> > unsigned size_t.
> Where did you notice this?   I didn't see it.


r5654.

>
> > python or numpy types. The use of inline and the local declaration of
> > variables would also have been caught early in a code review.
> What do you mean by the local declaration of variables?
>

r5653, gcc allows variables to be declared where used rather than at the
beginning of a block.  I believe this is part of a recent (proposed?)
standard, but will fail for other compilers. The inline keyword also tends
to be gcc/icc specific, although it is part of the C99 standard.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080815/e379c550/attachment.html