[Numpy-discussion] bug in ma.masked_all()?

Eric Firing efiring@hawaii....
Tue Dec 2 13:44:36 CST 2008


Pierre GM wrote:
> 
> On Dec 2, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> 
>> Pierre,
>>
>> Your change fixed masked_all for the example I gave, but I think it 
>> introduced a new failure in zeros:
> 
> Eric,
> Would you mind giving r6131 a try ? It's rather ugly but looks like it 
> works...

So far, so good.  Thanks very much.

Eric


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list