[Numpy-discussion] non-intuitive behaviour in numpy.array([list], numpy.object_)
Christopher Barker
Chris.Barker@noaa....
Thu Jan 3 11:50:05 CST 2008
Garnet Chan wrote:
> When constructing an numpy object array from a list of numpy arrays,
> one observes the following behaviour
>
>>>> import numpy as N
>>>> a=[N.zeros([2,2], N.object_), N.zeros([2,2], N.object_)]
>>>> b=N.array(a, N.object_)
>>>> print b.shape
> (2, 2, 2)
>>>> a=[N.zeros([2,2], N.object_), N.zeros([2,1], N.object_)]
>>>> b=N.array(a, N.object_)
>>>> print b.shape
> (2,)
>
> I understand that this is because in the 1st instance, numpy is trying
> to be clever and recognises that the list of arrays "a" can be
> reshaped into a 3-d array. But surely, if we are constructing an array
> with the object_ dtype, the first should also be converted into a
> shape (2,) array?
arrays of the _object dtype are plain weird -- as arbitrary objects can
be sequences (and mutable ones at that!), it's impossible to
automatically create the shape of arrays of objects that the user wants.
Perhaps it could be a bit smarter to be more consistent, but what you
really need to do is define the shape for numpy, and not expect it to
figure out what you want -- even if it does the right thing with one
example.
If you want a (2,) array, then do this:
>>> b = N.empty(2, dtype=N.object)
>>> b[:]=a
>>> b.shape
(2,)
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker@noaa.gov
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list