[Numpy-discussion] A couple of testing issues
Wed Jul 9 14:28:10 CDT 2008
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 14:26, Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 14:19, Alan McIntyre <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I can make a pass through all the test_* modules in the source tree
>> under test and post a warning if "def check_" is found in them before
>> handing things over to nose. Anyone else have thoughts on this?
> I don't think it's worth automating on every run. People can see for
> themselves if they have any such check_methods() and make the
> conversion once:
> nosetests -v --include "check_.*" --exclude "test_.*"
Hmm, could be wrong about that. Let me find the right incantation.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Numpy-discussion