[Numpy-discussion] arccosh for complex numbers, goofy choice of branch

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Thu Jul 17 17:25:06 CDT 2008


On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:

> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:07:38 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> [clip]
> > OK, that does it. I'm going to change it's behavior.
>
> The problem with bad arccosh branch cuts is still present:
>
> >>> import numpy as np
> >>> numpy.__version__
> '1.2.0.dev5436.e45a7627a39d'
> >>> np.arccosh(-1e-9 + 0.1j)
> (-0.099834078899207618-1.5707963277899337j)
> >>> np.arccosh(1e-9 + 0.1j)
> (0.099834078899207576+1.5707963257998594j)
> >>> np.arccosh(-1e-9 - 0.1j)
> (-0.099834078899207618+1.5707963277899337j)
> >>> np.arccosh(1e-9 - 0.1j)
> (0.099834078899207576-1.5707963257998594j)
>
> Ticket #854. http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/854
>
> I'll write up some tests for all the functions with branch cuts to verify
> that the cuts and their continuity are correct. (Where "correct" bears
> some resemblance to "ISO C standard", I think...)
>

Hmm,

The problem here is arccosh = log(x + sqrt(x**2 - 1))

when the given numbers are plugged into x**2 - 1, one lies above the
negative real axis, the other below and the branch cut [-inf,0] of sqrt
introduces the discontinuity. Maybe sqrt(x - 1)*sqrt(x+1) will fix that. I
do think the branch cut should be part of the documentation of all the
complex functions. I wonder what arccos does here?

Ah, here is a reference. <http://www.cs.umbc.edu/help/theory/identities.txt>Note

arccosh z = ln(z + sqrt(z-1) sqrt(z+1) )    not sqrt(z**2-1)


So I guess that is the fix.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080717/409041e1/attachment.html 


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list