[Numpy-discussion] NumPy 1.0.5 almost ready

Matthieu Brucher matthieu.brucher@gmail....
Fri Mar 21 05:17:43 CDT 2008


I confirm that the reference count is consistent when trying the exemple
given in the first post of the ticket (Ubuntu 7.10, gcc 4.1.3, Python 2.5.1
).

Matthieu

2008/3/21, Jarrod Millman <millman@berkeley.edu>:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> wrote:
> >  to, 2008-03-20 kello 21:09 +0100, Matthieu Brucher kirjoitti:
> > > Well, it is not completely solved. With the patch, the reference count
> >  > keeps on raising, but as it is for Python scalars, it is not a
> >  > problem, but the underlying problem in Py_DECREF will show up
> >  > eventually and it will need to be solved. But I'm afraid I'm not
> >  > intimate enough with the mecanisms of Numpys arrays to solve it.
> >
> >  I wrote a second patch that I think fixes the problem, and it seems to
> >  work at least for the testcases I tried.
>
>
> Excellent!
>
> Thanks so much,
>
>
> --
> Jarrod Millman
> Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs
> 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
> phone: 510.643.4014
> http://cirl.berkeley.edu/
> _______________________________________________
>
> Numpy-discussion mailing list
> Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>



-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080321/8249a405/attachment.html 


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list