[Numpy-discussion] SVD error in Numpy. NumPy Update reversed?
Tue Mar 25 10:37:42 CDT 2008
Travis, Does that mean it's not worth starting a
ticket? Sounds like nothing can be done, *except* to
put this in the documentation and the FAQ. It has
bitten several people.
--- "Travis E. Oliphant" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
>> Lou Pecora wrote:
> >> Thanks, Matthieu, that's a good step. But when
> >> SVD function throws an exception is it clear
> >> user can redefine niter and recompile?
> >> fix remains well hidden. Most user will be left
> >> puzzled. I think a comment in the raise
> >> would be good. Just point to the solution or
> >> the user could find it.
> > That's a valid concern. We could maybe pass down
> the iteration limit
> > as a keyword?
> This won't work without significant re-design. This
> limit is in the
> low-level code which is an f2c'd version of some
> BLAS which is NumPy's
> default SVD implementation if it can't find a vendor
> -Travis O.
-- Lou Pecora, my views are my own.
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
More information about the Numpy-discussion