[Numpy-discussion] missing function in numpy.ma?
Travis E. Oliphant
Thu Mar 27 15:11:22 CDT 2008
Charles Doutriaux wrote:
> Eric, Pierre,
> I agree the new ma is probably much better and we should use it.
> all i was saying is that 1.0.4 was working great with the small
> compatibility layer.
> I even have a frozen version of 1.0.5 devel that works great. Then
> suddenly everything broke.
I think it would be a good idea to do as you suggest and look into
making the oldnumeric.ma compatibility layer work as well as possible.
The problem is that the old compatibility layer was a pretty light
wrapper around the old numpy.core.ma.
I guess what could be done is to take the old numpy.core.ma file and
move it into oldnumeric.ma (along with the few re-namings that are there
now)? Could you test that option out and see if it works for you?
More information about the Numpy-discussion