[Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0

Anne Archibald peridot.faceted@gmail....
Wed May 7 19:17:45 CDT 2008


2008/5/7 Anne Archibald <peridot.faceted@gmail.com>:
> 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com>:
>
>  > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <peridot.faceted@gmail.com>
>  > wrote:
>  > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <millman@berkeley.edu>:
>  > >
>  > > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch:
>  > > >  http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134
>  > > >  In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch.  At
>  > > >  this point only critical bug fixes should be applied to the branch.
>  > > >  The trunk is now open for 1.2 development.
>  > >
>  > > I committed Travis' matrix indexing patch (plus a basic test) to
>  > > 1.1.x. Hope that's okay. (All tests pass.)
>  > >
>  >
>  > You should put it in the 1.2 branch also, then. I think fancy indexing and
>  > tolist, which Travis mentioned as having matrix workarounds, need to be
>  > checked to see if they still work correctly for matrices with the patch.
>
>  Ah. Good point. I did find a bug - x[:,0] doesn't do what you'd
>  expect. Best not release without either backing out my change. I'm
>  still trying to track down what's up.

Okay, more tests committed. Travis has removed the .tolist()
workaround (which, it turns out, doesn't actually depend on
__getitem__). Not sure what needs to happen for fancy indexing -
there's some alarming jiggery-pokery involving self._getitem that I
don't understand. But these are not bugfixes anyway.

Anne


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list