[Numpy-discussion] Status Report for NumPy 1.1.0
Charles R Harris
charlesr.harris@gmail....
Wed May 7 19:23:26 CDT 2008
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Anne Archibald <peridot.faceted@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2008/5/7 Anne Archibald <peridot.faceted@gmail.com>:
> > 2008/5/7 Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Anne Archibald <
> peridot.faceted@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 2008/5/7 Jarrod Millman <millman@berkeley.edu>:
> > > >
> > > > > I have just created the 1.1.x branch:
> > > > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/changeset/5134
> > > > > In about 24 hours I will tag the 1.1.0 release from the branch.
> At
> > > > > this point only critical bug fixes should be applied to the
> branch.
> > > > > The trunk is now open for 1.2 development.
> > > >
> > > > I committed Travis' matrix indexing patch (plus a basic test) to
> > > > 1.1.x. Hope that's okay. (All tests pass.)
> > > >
> > >
> > > You should put it in the 1.2 branch also, then. I think fancy
> indexing and
> > > tolist, which Travis mentioned as having matrix workarounds, need to
> be
> > > checked to see if they still work correctly for matrices with the
> patch.
> >
> > Ah. Good point. I did find a bug - x[:,0] doesn't do what you'd
> > expect. Best not release without either backing out my change. I'm
> > still trying to track down what's up.
>
> Okay, more tests committed. Travis has removed the .tolist()
> workaround (which, it turns out, doesn't actually depend on
> __getitem__). Not sure what needs to happen for fancy indexing -
> there's some alarming jiggery-pokery involving self._getitem that I
> don't understand. But these are not bugfixes anyway.
Heh, I just added some tests to 1.2 before closing ticket #707. They should
probably be merged with yours.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080507/2506be6c/attachment.html
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list