[Numpy-discussion] Going toward time-based release ?

Matthieu Brucher matthieu.brucher@gmail....
Tue May 13 05:46:15 CDT 2008


>
> As for the NumPy unit tests: I have placed coverage reports online
> (http://mentat.za.net/numpy/coverage).  This only covers Python (not
> extension) code, but having that part 100% tested is not impossible,
> nor would it take that much effort.  The much more important issue is
> having the C extensions tested, and if anyone can figure out a way to
> get gcov to generate those coverage reports, I'd be in the seventh
> heaven.  Thus far, the only way I know of is to build one large,
> static Python binary that includes numpy.
>

Hi,

I tried something similar with figleaf on my own code, but it seems that
every test that is decorated with @raises is not tested. Does your coverage
include these tests ? I didn't change much of your script to do it.
I tried the pinocchio nose extension as well, but it seems it is not
compatible with figleaf anymore :| (there is a thread on the testing ML, but
no answers so far :|)

Matthieu
-- 
French PhD student
Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/
Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://projects.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20080513/27887867/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list