[Numpy-discussion] ticket 788: possible blocker
Tue May 13 12:25:15 CDT 2008
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Travis E. Oliphant
> Besides, having a "test-per-checkin" is not the proper mapping in my
> mind. I'd rather see whole check-ins devoted to testing large pieces
> of code rather than spend all unit-test foo on a rigid policy of
> "regression" testing each check-in.
Stéfan is proposing "test-per-bugfix", not "test-per-checkin". That is
eminently feasible. You need to do some kind of testing to be sure
that you actually fixed the problem. It is simply *not* *that* *hard*
to write that in unit test form.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Numpy-discussion