[Numpy-discussion] New ufuncs

T J tjhnson@gmail....
Thu Nov 6 14:23:24 CST 2008


On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm inclined to go with logaddexp and add logsumexp as an alias for
> logaddexp.reduce. But I'll wait until tomorrow to see if there are more
> comments.

When working in other bases, it seems like it would be good to avoid
having to convert to base e and then back to base 2 with each function
call (for example).  Is there any desire add similar functions for
other standard bases?

   logaddexp2
   logaddexp10
   logdotexp2
   logdotexp10


More information about the Numpy-discussion mailing list