[Numpy-discussion] New ufuncs
T J
tjhnson@gmail....
Thu Nov 6 14:23:24 CST 2008
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm inclined to go with logaddexp and add logsumexp as an alias for
> logaddexp.reduce. But I'll wait until tomorrow to see if there are more
> comments.
When working in other bases, it seems like it would be good to avoid
having to convert to base e and then back to base 2 with each function
call (for example). Is there any desire add similar functions for
other standard bases?
logaddexp2
logaddexp10
logdotexp2
logdotexp10
More information about the Numpy-discussion
mailing list