[Numpy-discussion] Portable functions for nans, signbit, etc.
Charles R Harris
Thu Oct 2 08:31:29 CDT 2008
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:41 AM, David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Charles R Harris
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Which is rather clever. I think binary_cast will require some pointer
> Yep (the funny thing is that the bit twiddling will likely end up more
> readable than this C++ stuff)
The zip file has the bit twiddling, which is worth looking at if only for
the note on the PPC extended precision. Motorola seems to be a problem but
I don't think we support any of the 66xx series.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Numpy-discussion