[Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?
Tue Aug 4 13:11:57 CDT 2009
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, David Goldsmith<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Actually, Robert's really a robot (indeed, the Kernel of all robot minds) - no way a biologic is going to beat him. ;-)
So, what is the conclusion, do we need more practice, or can we sit
back and let Robert take care of things?
> --- On Tue, 8/4/09, Robert Kern <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?
>> To: "Discussion of Numerical Python" <email@example.com>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 10:08 AM
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:05, <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > What's going on with the response time here?
>> > I cannot even finish reading the question and start
>> Practice. :-)
>> Robert Kern
>> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma,
>> a harmless
>> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to
>> interpret it as
>> though it had an underlying truth."
>> -- Umberto Eco
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
More information about the NumPy-Discussion