[Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Tue Aug 4 13:11:57 CDT 2009


On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, David Goldsmith<d_l_goldsmith@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Actually, Robert's really a robot (indeed, the Kernel of all robot minds) - no way a biologic is going to beat him. ;-)

So, what is the conclusion, do we need more practice, or can we sit
back and let Robert take care of things?

Josef


>
> DG
>
> --- On Tue, 8/4/09, Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Why NaN?
>> To: "Discussion of Numerical Python" <numpy-discussion@scipy.org>
>> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 10:08 AM
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:05, <josef.pktd@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What's going on with the response time here?
>> >
>> > I cannot even finish reading the question and start
>> python.
>>
>> Practice. :-)
>>
>> --
>> Robert Kern
>>
>> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma,
>> a harmless
>> enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to
>> interpret it as
>> though it had an underlying truth."
>>   -- Umberto Eco
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list